Aram Amatuni in his political analysis states that it is of utmost importance for the states to have discussions on the governance models and structural forms and it is twice important to make these processes complementing to the public and political procedures in the countries which have recently started to formalize a political culture.
All these discussions however, Amatuni goes on, are groundless unless the most important issue still remains unsolved, the latter being the malfunctioning of the law and everyone being equal before the law. When the PAP came up with a proposal to make the country a parliamentary one, a question arises what will it change? Amatuni casts doubt on the efficiency of this proposal because he finds it impossible for the PAP MPs including their leader Tsarukyan to put down their mandates in order to observe the constitutional articles stating the MPs must not have adjacent businesses.
When the counterbalance importance in the governmental system is being discussed, Amatuni states that semi-presidential structure is the one to provide the check and balance mechanism as opposed to parliamentary system.
Amatuni mentions one of the major shortcomings of the incumbent governmental strategy of not discussing anything with the public, not regarding the latter’s approaches and opinions on how to deal with the oligarchic clans in the country and similar questions.
Amatuni concludes his analysis stating that it is useless to expect major changes after the presidential elections since the current powers on the political arena, both the pro-government and opposition, are the direct result of the incumbent administration’s activities. Amatuni finds the solution to these problems quite probable, only instead of discussing the current intrastate political procedures within the spectrum of the international political theory it would be feasible to deal with the concrete problems the country faces today. Otherwise, as Amatuni concludes, any good idea is a tamasha.
