Vahram Atanesyan, a former member of the NKR National Assembly and political analyst, wrote on his Facebook page.
“Armenian “classic scenario”… The historian of the future, perhaps in Glendale, perhaps in a provincial city of Russia, but with the same “concept” will write that the 150,000 Armenians of Artsakh, based on the principles of international law and popular norms, expected recognition for three decades, but the Azeri-Turkish brigands unleashed a war… He will add that in tough international conditions, the Armenians of Artsakh should either submit to Azerbaijan, or displaced, or go into armed struggle. And he will conclude that “the lesser evil was chosen so that the spirit of the national liberation struggle would remain alive.” And the poets will write: “We will still return to Artsakh.” And they will drink their daily share of anise vodka or “Aghdam” port wine exported from Azerbaijan to Europe. And in the midnight moon, they will spread their shell over the waters of the Pacific Ocean, the Seine, or the Neva… The wealthy in the casino, with the Turkish-Azerbaijani gamblers, will bet from half a million dollars and order the reporter of a colonial newspaper with five hundred readers to write another article about the fact that the United States Congress is preparing to discuss a resolution forcing the Armenians to return Artsakh to Azerbaijan. “.
