“It seemed that the new letter from Vano Siradeghyan, should have made his new fans happy. Only the fact of denying the news about his death is quite enough, but people who are “interested” in Vano Siradeghyan personality, are now nervous about the letter” writes “Hraparak” and adds “What do they say? They say why Siradeghyan has written to “Hraparak”’ chief editor”.
They also say that it is a fake letter, adding that the same way as you came up with the news of his death, the same way you came up with the fake letter. They say that it is not Vano Siradeghyan’s style. The super professionals in journalism, who give lessons about journalism, instead of working on it themselves, say that life and death are things which are like icons and you are not allowed to touch them and when you wrote that Siradeghyan’s friend is saying that he is not with us anymore, you violated some ethical and other rules.
To tell the truth, I am already tired of all these conversations. And I already don’t even see the need to answer. I just want to say that the latter is real however unpleasant it is for some people. It is written by Siradeghyan and that can prove the ones who know his handwriting. One of his bodyguards has recently proved, that it is his writing style, the only difference is that, it is somehow written with a sense of disappointment.
These people criticize the press saying that the latter is abandoning the ethic rules by giving misinformation, but the press claims that the letter is the real one, and stressed that the only person who have the right to criticize, is Vano Siradeghyan , but the latter didn’t say any word of condemn while sending the letter to the press, saying that such information is normal”.
