Monday, 17 06 2024
Monday, 17 06 2024
15:26
There are 9,000 detainees in Israeli prisons
15:07
Netanyahu opposes tactical ceasefire in Gaza
14:48
The European Union supports the people of Georgia. Borell
14:29
Yerevan will have a new master plan
14:10
The President of the European Commission can be re-elected
13:51
EventHub.am is the official ticketing agent for the concert of the world renowned Black Eyed Peas in Tbilisi
13:32
The air temperature will not change significantly
13:13
Euro 2024: Meetings of the day
12:54
Euro 2024: Serbia – England: 0:1
12:35
“Peace negotiations will be held tomorrow if Russia leaves Ukraine.” Zelensky
USA
12:16
Sullivan commented on Putin’s peaceful initiative regarding Ukraine
11:57
Euro-2024: Slovenia – Denmark: 1:1
11:38
Euro 2024: Denmark wins after half time
11:19
Euro 2024: The Netherlands beat Poland with a score of 2:1
11:00
Euro 2024: The starting lineups of Poland and the Netherlands
10:41
A man attacked fans with an ax before the Poland-Netherlands match
10:22
The message of the Ministry of Defense of Azerbaijan does not correspond to reality. RA Ministry of Defense
10:03
IDBank issues the 3rd tranche of dollar bonds of 2024
13:13
Euro-2024: what matches are there on June 16
12:54
Euro-2024: Italy-Albania: 2:1
12:35
Euro-2024: Starting teams of Italy and Albania
12:16
Euro-2024: Spain beat Croatia
11:57
Germany-Scotland: After the first half, the Germans win by a large margin
11:38
Euro-2024: opening ceremony
11:19
The war and destruction in Gaza
11:00
“The second force of NATO has penetrated the Caucasus.” Gantaharyan
10:41
249.5 million drams to sports federations
10:22
Zelensky’s office responded to Putin’s proposals
10:03
Four forces propose holding a referendum on EU membership
11:57
Germany blocks new EU sanctions against Russia

There were two significant circumstances that did not get enough attention; Hakob Badalyan

Political commentator Hakob Badalyan wrote on his Facebook page.

Yesterday, when the new round of Armenian-Azerbaijani negotiations was starting in Washington, I mentioned in an interview (the link is on my page in the previous post) that I see more likely an increase in tension than peace from those negotiations.

Unfortunately, just hours later, Baku’s deadly provocation occurred in Artsakh.

Why am I more likely to see tensions rise? For some reason, two characteristics that needed more attention in the Armenian public-political field took place.

Likewise, the greeting of the representative of the State Department regarding Aliyev’s speech about “amnesty” remained fleeting. The address given on May 28 was utterly an ultimatum and blackmail to Artsakh and its leadership. Would you be willing to accept my terms? I’m sorry, won’t you, then you must leave? And that speech is “welcomed,” and the Armenian public does not find the collective strength, which it considers significantly in the case of the Russians and does very well, to ask Washington, “What did you welcome in that speech?”

And the second characteristic circumstance. There was a leak in the Russian press that Washington wants to organize a non-public contact between the representatives of Artsakh and Baku in a third country. It threatens Artsakh that Baku will carry out an anti-terrorist operation if it refuses.

If I am wrong, I apologize, but there was no denial from Washington regarding the threat to Artsakh, no denial that there was no threat to Artsakh. Many may ask why the Russian press leak should be officially denied. Yes, of course; why should Washington deny it if it does not need it? Armenia needed that denial, but Armenia did not find the public-political potential to correct that question either.

Those two stark realities allow me to see the possibility that the Washington talks will lead to tension rather than peace.

And the third circumstance, which I wrote about a few days ago, after the meeting of the foreign ministers of Britain and Baku and the subsequent “loves” on Twitter, saying that this perhaps suggests that Baku is getting some “charges” before Washington. We will have a lot to expect—complex negotiation.

Does this mean you didn’t have to go to Washington, or you had to leave and come back? No. Not going to Washington and critical capitals regarding regional influence, including Moscow, does not solve any issue. Because if we cannot solve a problem by going, then we will not be able to solve any problem by not going.

The critical thing for Armenia, as I have said many times, is the public-political tough questions “accompanying” the official work in all directions, which should be addressed to those working capitals related to the responsibility of all of them in maintaining the international principle of non-use of force and the threat of force.

Instead of that, our society has been busy for nearly three years “choosing” “good” and “bad” negotiation platforms, or choosing “pro-Russian” and “pro-Western” and “analyzing” what is happening with us and around us according to those tastes.

There are no good and lousy negotiation platforms, there is a socio-political state organism capable of doing good and bad work on those platforms, or it doesn’t exist.

And we should be able to start discussing all this calmly, quietly, with the ability to listen to each other, because if we are not able to listen to each other, of course, it is about listening to each other’s rational conversation, and not about listening to epitaphs or military-patriotic “myths.”, to say the least, it is delusional to think that anyone outside will listen to us in the broadest sense of the word.”

Հեղինակներ
ԳՈՀԱՐ ՀԱՅՐԱՊԵՏՅԱՆ
ԳՈՀԱՐ ՀԱՅՐԱՊԵՏՅԱՆ
Արթուր Աղաբեկյան
Արթուր Աղաբեկյան
ՎՈԼՈԴՅԱ ՄՈՒՇԵՂՅԱՆ
ՎՈԼՈԴՅԱ ՄՈՒՇԵՂՅԱՆ
Դավիթ Գրիգորյան
Դավիթ Գրիգորյան
Категории
Ուղիղ
Новости
Search